A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among possible neighbours over the construction of the wall at a coastal site in a north Dublin suburb, a case which includes attracted nationwide focus subsequent an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed loved ones dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental issues, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has evolved right into a remarkably publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design operates at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to build their relatives residence. The situation has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes along Ireland’s coastline, in which enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of set up citizens. Based on the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their possible neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally people of Dublin Highway, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their organizing permission by building a wall over and above the boundaries of their website, leading to an encroachment on a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such areas are topic to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, specially within a sensitive coastal natural environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, and that is partially designed, is in the correct position. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The couple accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to maintain their check out, an allegation that has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal arranging disputes, the place sights of The ocean are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-high h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations, an image which includes because grow to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These steps weren't simply symbolic; they have been intended to Assemble Visible proof in the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Times documented, describing how the two Males entered the water in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the website grew to become Among the most placing descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these kinds of actions were being cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into an area afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up coated intimately with the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as audience sought to be aware of the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt construction pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital second while in the authorized timeline.
For the core on the dispute is a disagreement in excess of boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as created, goes outside of what was accepted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has been called meticulous in his assessment of planning documents, maps, and situations attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by worry for environmental defense and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting alternatively that it's about ensuring that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing connection to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a pair merely endeavoring to create a loved ones home in accordance While using the legislation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Place of Conservation and say that every one works are carried out according to Skilled information and accredited programs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into The ocean for the duration of a storm, tend not to change the underlying facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about construction of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for a predicament that numerous observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier pointed out that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in regional advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from very unique professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waist-large water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded via waist-significant drinking water through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both equally the Bodily reality from the coastline and also the symbolic mother nature with the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an too much technique.
Because the High Court proceedings carry on, the result remains unsure. The court docket ought to figure out if the wall as crafted complies with arranging authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment right into a Special Place of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging circumstances. Yet the human aspect stays central: neighbours who must Stay along with one another extended after the lawful expenditures are compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, although the implications of the situation extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. What's more, it underscores how quickly an area disagreement can escalate when basic problems such as environmental security and residence rights are perceived to be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a place of purely natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. Whether it is going Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times to ultimately be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probable continue to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.